← Back to home

Frameworks and Models for Startup Marketing - Part 1/3

May 2017 · Nikhil Samuel

This article covers the first third of major frameworks I've encountered that might be useful when thinking about startup marketing. I'll briefly go through classical startup frameworks and then dive deeper into frameworks specific to marketing and growth.

This article is a response to my own need for frameworks for unhindered thinking and clarity in making marketing decisions.

Why are startup frameworks useful?

Startup frameworks make for a great starting point in putting forward your ideas, implementing them, or looking at them from a different perspective.

Frameworks

Porter's Five Forces

Every reader who has gone to business school has come across the 5 forces framework.

Michael Porter propounded the Five Forces Framework model leading to large-scale adoption by many organizations. The basic tenet: any company faces 5 major forces of competition when in a market, not just from its competitors.

The five forces are:

  1. Threat of new entrants - What is the time and cost of entry into the market? Are the barriers of entry high? What are the cost advantages? Is there technology protection? Do you have specialized knowledge about the market?
  2. Threat of substitutes - What are your substitutes in the market? Are you 10x better than them?
  3. Bargaining power of customers - How many customers do you have? What is the average basket size? Are customers price sensitive? Are the switching costs high?
  4. Bargaining power of suppliers - How many suppliers do you have? How big are they? Will you be able to quickly substitute suppliers? Are you overly dependent on one supplier?
  5. Industry rivalry - How many competitors do you have in the market? Are you 10x better either in speed/quality?

All 2x2 matrices

The power of drawing a vertical line intersecting with a horizontal line is grossly underestimated. The depth of clarity in demystifying complex concepts is so simple.

Technology Adoption Lifecycle

This model was suggested by Clayton Christensen in The Innovator's Dilemma. It's a sociological model that describes how a new product is adopted and describes the trends through a normal distribution curve.

The lifecycle progresses through: Innovators → Early Adopters → Early Majority → Late Majority → Laggards

The Startup Pyramid

Sean Ellis suggested this model. He presently works at Qualaroo and GrowthHackers.com.

There are three phases to the pyramid:

Product/Market fit

Marc Andreessen came up with the term Product/Market fit as:

Product/market fit means being in a good market with a product that can satisfy that market.

As a startup, your entire energy must be focused on achieving product market fit in the shortest time possible. How does one find out if their startup has reached PM fit? A few ways:

Brian Balfour's excellent article on PM fit →

AARRR Framework by Dave McClure

AARRR is a framework to measure customer and model customer behavior, then perform a set of actions with the right metrics to track for every stage.

The customer journey is mapped in a funnel:

For each part of the funnel, Dave presented questions, major actions, and metrics to aid tracking.

His infamous Slideshare →

The Hierarchy of Engagement - by Sarah Tavel

Sarah presents a framework to evaluate non-transactional consumer companies. The hierarchy has 3 levels:

She says:

As companies move up the hierarchy, their products become better, harder to leave, and ultimately create virtuous loops that make the product self-perpetuating. Companies that scale the hierarchy are incredibly well positioned to demonstrate growth and retention that investors are looking to see.

She goes on to present amazing slides here →

Quant-based marketing

QBM was used by Noah Kagan, Chief Sumo at AppSumo and previously at Facebook. He used it to grow Mint. The main idea of quant-based marketing is about working backwards from the goal and mapping out what you need on an excel. It's that simple.

Read Part 2/3 →